bq.. Telegraph: “For God to create the universe he would have to be hyper-intelligent. But intelligence only evolves over time. Is that about the strength of it?”
Dawkins: “It’s worse than that, the argument for God starts by assuming what it is attempting to explain — intelligence, complexity, it comes to the same thing — and so it explains nothing. God is a non-explanation. Whereas evolution by natural selection _is_ an explanation. It really does start simply and become complex.”
p. — Sunday Telegraph (UK) interview with Richard Dawkins, Sept. 26, 1999
Au
Evolution can’t explain God, so God is a non-explanation?
The 2nd guy doesn’t make any sense and I have concluded he’s a pompous douche who probably wears a vest regularly.